(Hearthstone) Frost Lich Jaina MIA

投稿日：2022年11月7日

(Knights + Castle Nathria Standard) 3 games: Frost Lich Jaina Mage
Subscribe and turn on notifications for a new video every day!

Deck List: AAECAf0EDNjsA53uA6bvA9D5A6qgBOWwBL/OBJjUBLjZBJfvBNjrBYjsBQ7U6gPS7APT7APW7AOogQSljQSfkgShkgT8ngTx0wTb3gTs7QSCkwWEkwUA
(https://pastebin.com/QbMhgbc7)

Music: Beethoven Piano Sonata no. 31 in A flat Major, Op. 110, performed by Paul Pitman

関連

-Hearthstoneの攻略動画
-Hearthstone

Nel owo より:

2022年11月7日 5:48 AM

Cool deck dude, I was wondering x2 snow man or x2 spammy archaist? much love

返信
Deekashh より:

2022年11月7日 5:52 AM

Think i just saw he missed lethal before the end

返信
sp33dzer0 より:

2022年11月7日 6:27 AM

In that last game wasn't hero power + the 3/5 goblin lethal?

返信
- Pedro Murta より:
  
  2022年11月7日 6:43 AM
  
  no wildfire
  
  返信
Panos As より:

2022年11月7日 6:46 AM

Every instance of priest that I witness makes me curse blizzard

返信
Ctorj より:

2022年11月7日 6:53 AM

17:46 He missed Lethal with Reckless Apprentice.

返信
- Spike99 より:
  
  2022年11月7日 7:19 AM
  
  Only 17 no? No wildfire hero power so apprentice only adds another 1 damage
  
  返信
Osman Soysal より:

2022年11月7日 7:01 AM

How kind of click bait is this? Before the video Jaina is everywhere but i didn't see the card whole video

返信
- A Keyasa より:
  
  2022年11月7日 7:22 AM
  
  The title say MIA.
  
  返信
- Jimmy Wennerholm より:
  
  2022年11月7日 7:38 AM
  
  MIA = Missing In Action
  
  Next one please
  
  返信
Kenneth Kline より:

2022年11月7日 7:07 AM

I was hoping you would lose your first game 🙂

返信
Boss より:

2022年11月7日 8:10 AM

why does he keep saying "they" to his single opponent? its so weird

返信
- Sky Roy より:
  
  2022年11月7日 9:18 AM
  
  They is standard english usage for single person unknown gender. Plenty of women play Hearthstone, so they is flat out grammatically correct and standard. (Unless you lead with the assumption that every Hearthstone player is a dude.)
  
  返信
- Boss より:
  
  2022年11月7日 9:28 AM
  
  @Sky Roy So it is a woke thing? Like i said, english isn't my first language, so for me it is confusing. Everyone else just says "he/ his" etc to their opponents, so it sounds weird to me.
  
  返信
- D G より:
  
  2022年11月7日 10:48 AM
  
  @Boss They isn't plural, english isn't your first language and many native speakers make that error, but its not really a "woke" thing. Its just a singular pronoun when the gender of the person you are discussing isn't known or relevant. Using "they" to refer to a single person is very common and not a modern usage whatsoever.
  
  返信
- Sky Roy より:
  
  2022年11月7日 10:48 AM
  
  @Boss I don't quite understand the 'woke' thing. In English, a normal conversation might go "I went to see the doctor and got some bad news" "Oh, what did they tell you?" They, in this instance, refers to the doctor - single person gender unknown. If you know the gender of the opponent it makes sense to say he, but it makes no sense to say that if you don't know the gender. There are plenty of Hearthstone streamers who just use 'he' for everyone, because they assume that everyone is a man, but that is absurd since it is clearly a false assumption.
  
  返信
- BlitzPie より:
  
  2022年11月7日 10:53 AM
  
  The Oxford English Dictionary traces singular they back to 1375, where it appears in the medieval romance William and the Werewolf. Except for the old-style language of that poem, its use of singular they to refer to an unnamed person seems very modern. Here’s the Middle English version: ‘Hastely hiȝed eche . . . þei neyȝþed so neiȝh . . . þere william & his worþi lef were liand i-fere.’ In modern English, that’s: ‘Each man hurried . . . till they drew near . . . where William and his darling were lying together.’
  
  Since forms may exist in speech long before they’re written down, it’s likely that singular they was common even before the late fourteenth century. That makes an old form even older.
  
  In the eighteenth century, grammarians began warning that singular they was an error because a plural pronoun can’t take a singular antecedent. They clearly forgot that singular you was a plural pronoun that had become singular as well. You functioned as a polite singular for centuries, but in the seventeenth century singular you replaced thou, thee, and thy, except for some dialect use. That change met with some resistance. In 1660, George Fox, the founder of Quakerism, wrote a whole book labeling anyone who used singular you an idiot or a fool.
  
  返信
Kyle より:

2022年11月7日 8:16 AM

That priest game was maybe too early of a concede. Could have killed the Neptulon with HP and Frozen Touch, then there was still a 5% chance to draw Mordresh next turn for lethal if he didnt have a shadow spell.

返信
CarpeGuitarrem より:

2022年11月7日 8:19 AM

Kibler: "Keleseth Rogue"
Me: "Now that's a name I have not heard in a very long time."

返信